University of Isfahan Metaphysics 2476-3276 2 5 2010 08 23 Husserl – Derrida: Dispute over Language Husserl – Derrida: Dispute over Language 23 38 19147 FA H Fathzadeh Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Zanjan Journal Article 2016 06 14 As Derrida points out, Husserl needs the logical purity of meaning to constitute phenomenology, and he assures this by differentiating expressive and indicative signs. The realm of Platonic senses is confirmed by adopting expressive signs, wherein language expresses phenomenological ideal truths. But by refusing Husserl’s arguments and showing paradoxical faces of Husserl’s program, Derrida declares the impossibility of phenomenological project. Here we want to evaluate Derrida's analyses. As Derrida points out, Husserl needs the logical purity of meaning to constitute phenomenology, and he assures this by differentiating expressive and indicative signs. The realm of Platonic senses is confirmed by adopting expressive signs, wherein language expresses phenomenological ideal truths. But by refusing Husserl’s arguments and showing paradoxical faces of Husserl’s program, Derrida declares the impossibility of phenomenological project. Here we want to evaluate Derrida's analyses. https://mph.ui.ac.ir/article_19147_f585e9df7e404a2cda12635f086fc0d8.pdf