<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Metaphysics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-3276</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>23</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Baker’s Theory of Constitution and the Relations between Things</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Baker’s Theory of Constitution and the Relations between Things</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>51</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>68</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">22156</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/mph.2017.93018.0</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zakeri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Baker’s Theory of Constitution and the Relations between Things</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Many ordinary things are made up of material things. For example, the statue of Ferdousi in the University of Tehran is made up of a particular piece of bronze. Calling the relation between the statue of Ferdousi and that piece of bronze material constitution, many philosophers have claimed that this relation between a material thing and the thing that it constitutes is identity. Baker, in contrast, believes that these things have genuine unity without necessary identity. In this article, I first illustrate the principles of Baker’s theory and his explanation of this relation. Then I will assess the theory against objections. I will conclude that this theory can successfully explain relation between many of material things, but concerning things belonging to human beings, the theory fails to introduce a criterion for constitution.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Many ordinary things are made up of material things. For example, the statue of Ferdousi in the University of Tehran is made up of a particular piece of bronze. Calling the relation between the statue of Ferdousi and that piece of bronze material constitution, many philosophers have claimed that this relation between a material thing and the thing that it constitutes is identity. Baker, in contrast, believes that these things have genuine unity without necessary identity. In this article, I first illustrate the principles of Baker’s theory and his explanation of this relation. Then I will assess the theory against objections. I will conclude that this theory can successfully explain relation between many of material things, but concerning things belonging to human beings, the theory fails to introduce a criterion for constitution.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">theory of constitution</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Identity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">derived properties</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">primary kind</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Lynne Rudder Baker</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://mph.ui.ac.ir/article_22156_624915610feb56c36bdce673c3ce29d1.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
