University of Isfahan Metaphysics 2476-3276 12 30 2020 09 22 Critique of the Grammar of the Immortality of the Soul from Phillips Point of View Critique of the Grammar of the Immortality of the Soul from Phillips Point of View 49 64 25463 10.22108/mph.2021.124360.1237 FA Zeinab Shakibi Assistant Professor of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Payame Noor University, Tehram. Iran Journal Article 2020 08 12 As a philosopher of religion who believes in anti-realism, Phillips denies the reality of religious matters such as "God", "soul", "resurrection" and so on. But as a religious Christian, He tries to reduce the meaning of immortality of the soul into having a moral life. Accordingly, he defines the immortality of the soul as equivalent to ignoring desires and achieving a moral life. Its immortality means man's participation in living with God. So he takes a pragmatic approach in explaining the grammar of immortality. This article has shown that in his view, semantically, there is no clear boundary between atheism and faith. On the other hand, the basis of his pragmatic approach is that ethics is based solely on religion, while most current theories in the field of meta-ethics reject this view of the relationship between religion and ethics. It also turns out that his view about immortality conflicts with the religious life of Christians. As a philosopher of religion who believes in anti-realism, Phillips denies the reality of religious matters such as "God", "soul", "resurrection" and so on. But as a religious Christian, He tries to reduce the meaning of immortality of the soul into having a moral life. Accordingly, he defines the immortality of the soul as equivalent to ignoring desires and achieving a moral life. Its immortality means man's participation in living with God. So he takes a pragmatic approach in explaining the grammar of immortality. This article has shown that in his view, semantically, there is no clear boundary between atheism and faith. On the other hand, the basis of his pragmatic approach is that ethics is based solely on religion, while most current theories in the field of meta-ethics reject this view of the relationship between religion and ethics. It also turns out that his view about immortality conflicts with the religious life of Christians. https://mph.ui.ac.ir/article_25463_28116e83237f8401f992aeaefda59ec9.pdf